Saturday, December 6, 2008

The Hof-ington Post

[Warning: what follows is a rare post on a serious topic. It's been a month since the election, and based on my track record on this blog, that means it's time for me to get around to commenting on it. Proceed at your own risk. I'm an intelligent person, but I'm not generally interested in politics, policy, economics, etc.; I readily admit that I get about 90% of my non-sports news from Comedy Central. I'm generally smart enough to separate the facts from the Stewart/Colbert hyperbole, but I'd be lying if I said those shows haven't influenced my opinions. Therefore, it will not bother me at all if you don't share my political viewpoint. Also, if any of my opinions are based on ignorance or a misunderstanding of the truth, please correct me in the comments. I'm just going to start typing; I don't really know yet what I'll end up saying or how long it will be. I do know, however, that I won't be discussing Prop 8 on my blog. I have conflicted feelings about the issue as a whole, the church's involvement in it, and the post-election protests, and don't wish to get into them here. I will, however, recommend the talk given by Elder Hales at the most recent General Conference to any LDS members wondering how they should respond to those who are angry with them because of their beliefs. Anyway, here we go.]

Voting in Harlem was an unusual experience. My polling station was at a church less than a block from my apartment, and I headed there at about 9:00, figuring that those who went to cast their votes before work would be gone, and I wouldn't have to wait in line long.

I was wrong. The line stretched outside the door for about a block, and once I got inside the building things were pretty chaotic. It seemed that everyone in the neighborhood was so excited to vote (for Obama) this year, that they wanted to do it as soon as they could (I talked to many people who voted at night and were in and out in less than five minutes). The volunteers were not prepared for the turnout, and the line stalled. I ended up waiting for over two hours before I finally pulled back the curtain and entered the voting booth.

As I looked over the names on the ancient device (we had those old-school voting machines with the big levers and such, like a giant vintage cash register), I realized why I had struggled to find information on any of the local races: virtually every judge, councilman, and sanitation commissioner was running unopposed, or if there were four names it was in a category that said "choose four." (In that particular race, two of the names were listed as both Republicans and Democrats. Not sure how that works.) I quickly made my selections and pulled the lever. Although my polling place disappointingly had no "I Voted" stickers, I had in fact voted, which is yet another way in which I'm better than Tim Robbins.

That night, I gathered with some friends for a bachelor party of sorts (yes, Mormon bachelor parties are exactly as dull as you'd expect, although there's nothing wrong with hanging out with the guys and eating pizza), and we watched the election results. Once the networks started calling the election for Obama, the neighborhood erupted. People began honking horns, screaming, banging pots and pans...it was like New Year's Day. The big party in the area was at the government building just three blocks from where I was. Most of our group went to join in the revelry, even though nearly all of them voted for McCain.

Even though I voted for Obama, I decided not to join the party, but still passed many exuberant people on my short trip home. I logged onto Facebook and was stunned by the status updates of my friends. Words and phrases like "socialist," "take my money," "Americans are morons," "this is a sad day," and "building a bomb shelter" abounded. I was stunned.

A month has now passed, and unsurprisingly, the extreme feelings of both joy and alarm expressed on Election Night seem to have been tempered. Time has a way of doing that. But I felt even back on November 4 that both types of overly emotional responses were unwarranted.

I have a feeling that many of those who are excited about the change Obama has promised to bring may be disappointed when they see what actually happens. Whether it's because of opposition from political opponents, their desire to achieve high approval ratings or get reelected, or even just that they realize that they are a representative for the entire nation and not just the people that voted for them, it seems to me that presidents always wind up being more centrist than they claimed to be during their campaigns. Compromises will inevitably have to be made, and it seems impossible that Obama will be able to achieve all of the goals he set forth prior to the election (we are now officially into the area where you can feel free to point out my ignorance or naivete).

If I'm right, and "business as usual" prevails in a general sense under President Obama, I don't view that as a bad thing. Life is generally good for most Americans, and although some things are less than desirable right now, that's the way things go. It's cyclical. The economy isn't great right now, but it will get better. And it would eventually improve whether Obama, Bush or McCain was president, although different policies espoused by different people will influence the speed and the degree of improvement.

If those who view Obama as a deity of sorts are setting themselves up for disappointment, I still feel that those who view his election as the end of the world are even more off base. In the weeks leading up to the election and in the first few days afterwards, the things I heard or read some people say made it seem like Obama was pledging to surrender the country to Russia if he won. Even if they don't agree with him, it seems ludicrous that anyone would believe he doesn't like America or want to make positive differences for Americans.

I heard a lot of people say, "we don't know anything about him." Um, seriously? I wasn't paying very close attention, and even I know that he plays basketball, he has two kids, he went to Columbia, he smokes, he used to go by "Barry," and a bunch of other facts about him, not tot mention everything I know about his political stances. I guess people can choose not to believe these things, but if that's the case I don't know how they expect to find out what Obama is like.

A lot of people labelled Obama as a socialist, always in a negative way. It's ironic to me that so many Mormons view socialism as such an evil thing, even though the people of Enoch and the people in 4 Nephi lived a form of socialism and were the two most successful, righteous, and happy societies in scriptural history. Plus, other than the threat of higher taxes, what about Obama's policies and promises makes him a socialist, or at least more of a socialist than other mainstream candidates (again, I'm not as informed a voter as many, so please enlighten me if there's major socialist stuff I'm unaware of)?

Our country and government has been socialistic in at least some aspects for a long time, and thank goodness for that. I don't know what I would be doing right now or where I would be living if I hadn't received Medicaid assistance after my gall bladder surgery. I'll admit that I felt slightly ashamed at not being able to pay my own bills, but I was incapable of doing so, and I'm very grateful for the assistance I've received. If Obama's plans will result in more people getting the health care they need, then I support them, and if that makes me a socialist, so be it.

I believe in the principles of capitalism (entrepreneurship, working for a living, pulling yourself up by your bootstraps, etc.), but I believe in the principle of charity even more. Before I came to New York, I don't think I had a very good conception of what life was like for people (especially kids) in low-income areas. Most of the kids in Harlem come into the world at such a huge disadvantage that they would have virtually no chance of succeeding in a strictly capitalistic society. Some "redistribution of wealth" is necessary to give these kids a fair chance. I'm willing to pay higher taxes if that's what it takes to help these people. This, more than anything else, is why I voted for Obama: because he and his party seem to me to be more sincere about and committed to helping those who are less fortunate than themselves.

The other big reason why I voted for a Democrat for the first time relates to my overall view of the position of President. To me, the president's most important job involves public relations. The president is the government's ultimate ambassador, it's public face. When things are going good, he should tell us that. When things are bad, tell us, and then explain what will be done to correct the problem. If something is bad because government screwed up, accept responsibility, apologize, and fix it. I feel most people don't expect perfection from their elected leaders, but they expect honesty. It perhaps was unfair to McCain, but I felt since about the beginning of the primaries that I could not in good conscience vote for the Republican candidate, no matter who it was, because of what I viewed as a high level of dishonesty and disrespect shown to the public by the president, his cabinet and their appointed spokespersons over the last few years. The Bush administration's approach to PR has been atrocious.

I would love to have a Hollywood president like David Palmer from 24 or Dave from Dave, someone who exudes strength and confidence, someone who seems intelligent and optimistic when they speak. As I said above, even when some things are bad, in America things are generally good. I want a president who speaks and acts in a way that helps people to feel good, to have a general feeling of happiness and contentment. Obama, while clearly no Dennis Haysbert, seems to fit that bill pretty well.

Basically, I knew that my day-to-day life wouldn't change much regardless of which candidate won, but I voted for Obama because I feel his policies and beliefs are at their core more compassionate than McCain's, and because I feel that when Obama speaks to me and to the rest of the country he tells the truth and will continue to do so. Simplistic as they may be, that's how it is. And now I can go back to my usual mode, where I don't worry much about any of these things, at least for a few more years.

8 comments:

Nicole said...

I really enjoyed this post, Jeff. It vocalized a lot of sentiments that I think I was a little scared to admit. Although I didn't actually vote this year (due to a technicality of still having a CA license, and not being able to register in MI. And when I went to CA to go to the early polling site, it was an hour drive each way and 3-5 hour wait...I was only in CA for a day in a half)

But I was totally on the fence for the presidential race. I knew I didn't want to vote for McCain, even though I've traditionally voted conservative. But I wasn't sure I could handle the wrath of my ultra-conservative husband and extended family for voting for "socialist" Obama. I did want to vote on the Prop 8 race, but it wasn't meant to be.

Janelle said...

So, I mostly scanned your post, not reading in super detail, but I did have a couple of comments.

(1) Woohoo that he won!
(2) You forgot the Facebook statuses of people saying they were moving to Canada.
(3) To the peopel who say "we don't know anything about him," all I have to say is that he's publisehd two books. Try reading them.

shabba shabba said...

Nice work. I'm on board. I think what we saw this year is what those who paid attention every four years (and I'm not necessarily one of those people) see. It's what we'll see in 2012, 2016, and beyond. Just, well, politics. People have strong views and it can be tough to acknowledge any virtue in opposing points of view. But when we can't be level-headed, we get reactionary sentiment from either side of an issue or candidate. Here's to level-headedness.

Unknown said...

Choosing between Obama and McCain was like choosing between cancer and AIDS. Either way, you end up dead. It's just a matter of how you want to go. At least we get to choose, I suppose.

Personally, I thought Ron Paul was the best choice out there, even though I know there are hordes of people who completely and utterly disagree with me. I kind of wish he wouldn't have run under the Republican ticket. Most of America seems fed up with the Republicans right now, and his chances may have gone up if he would have run as an Independent.

Actually, he never had much of a chance, in my opinion. His policies and his take on the issues make too much sense, and his record in politics is squeaky clean. The media firebombed him because they had no dirt on him, nothing to use against him. He wanted to bring back the Gold Standard. He wanted to get rid of the IRS, the Department of Education, and a dozen other wasteful Government Agencies that use far too much of our money. He wanted limited, streamlined government. He wanted to bring our troops back from Iraq and build up our borders here where we live. He was huge on the Internet but, of course, how valid is the Internet? In the case of Ron Paul's campaign for the Presidency, not very -- according to the media.

Personally, I think the media has far too much influence over who is elected. "Fair" and "balanced" certainly doesn't seem to enter the equation when you're talking about CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, ABC News, and CBS News, not to mention countless newspapers and talk radio networks. Each outlet has their own slant on who they want in office. When a large media outlet virtually backs a candidate, that candidate's chances of election drastically increases. Such is the case with Obama.

Anyway, this comment has become far too long and involved. I'm not one for politics, and I generally keep my views to myself. During this time of economic turmoil and strife, I feel that we as a country need more cowbell.

That's why I voted for Christopher Walken.

Megan said...

I also wish David Palmer could be our president.

Anonymous said...

Hopefully I can do this quickly. Obama is on the record as wanting more transfer payments...in other words, giving tax refunds to those who have no tax liability. If we continue on the road we are on, soon more than 50% of the populace will pay zero income tax. That's the tipping point, it will only accelerate from there as incetive to produce disappears and incentive to take increases.

I would love to live in a society like the City of Enoch, but the most important concept in that society was a religious commitment and covenant to live the law of consecration. In our secular society, it is impossible to have everyone make this covenant, so any socialism or sharing madated by the government is forced. This breeds resentment among those from whom it is taken and sloth among those to whom it is given. It also encourages people to look to government for all there needs. There is a reason communist governments fight against most religion...they need government to be the people's god.

I am a staunch capitalist for practicality's sake. It is the best system for a society made up of people of differing religious views to bring the most prosperity to the most people...including low income families. The challenge for those of us living in prosperity is to have the opportunity to be selfish, but still choose to be generous with what we have acquired.

BTW, statistics have shown that if you just graduate from high school and wait until you're married to have kids, the probability that you will be above the poverty line is overwhelming...poverty isn't created by government policy, but government policy can encourage the conditions that create poverty (see failing schools and welfare programs that have led to the disintigration of the family).

Wow, that wasn't short at all. Sorry. Anyway, don't take this comment as an endorsement of McCain. I voted for him, but he was clearly a dud.

Want to go to the Vegas Bowl with me? I promise to try to find tickets that don't have a huge light pole blocking our view.

jeff said...

Thanks for commenting everybody. I'm glad that my blog brings so many people of such divergent political views together.

I used to think Walken was British, so subconsciously I probably thought I couldn't vote for him. But I like that idea.

angelalois said...

nice post. I agree that people are setting themselves up for disappointment. This one girl at work is RIDICULOUSLY pro-Obama, so much that I'm afraid to even talk to her about anything for fear somehow the conversation will turn to Obama, and she mentioned to me after the election that she was so happy he won since "everytime (I) go to the grocery store everything is more expensive then the last time I went." Say what? You think Obama is going to fix inflation? She has no clue, but sees him as the answer to all the world's ills.

And yeah, all the status updates on facebook were SO polar. Half my friends are moving to Canada, the other half are so happy they are offering their first-borns to Obama. So weird.